Utah Minority Bar Association C/o Utah State Bar
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260692832
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8019799979
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $35,561
- Expenses
- $42,469
- Assets
- $88,253
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDRES GONZALEZ (PRESIDENT)
- JESSICA RAMIREZ (PRESIDENT-EL)
People named in this filing
- ANDRES GONZALEZ (PRESIDENT)
- JESSICA RAMIREZ (PRESIDENT-EL)
- TONY GRAF (PAST PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Utah minority bar association's mission is to advance the interests of diversity in the judicial system and to raise awareness of the need for more diversity in the legal profession in Utah.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization provided networking events and continuing legal education seminars for its members. The organization awarded scholarships to students attending the university of Utah or brigham young university law schools. The organizations scholarship program supports students financially by helping them pay all or a portion of one semester. This program is funded primarily through the organizations annual banquet. The organization also contributed several thousand dollars to various 501(c)(3) public charities committed to helping diverse groups within Utah.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 87% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88.3%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.4%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.08; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.