Utah Juvenile Defender Resource Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800959639
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8014038624
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Legal Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,975
- Expenses
- $32,215
- Assets
- $11,999
- Liabilities
- $1,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAMELA VICKREY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- PAMELA VICKREY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Utah juvenile defender resource center (the "corporation") has been organized, pursuant to the Utah revised nonprofit corporation act (the "act"), as a non-profit corporation to operate exclusively for the promotion of social welfare, solely and exclusively in the interest of the general public, which is exempt from income tax under section 501(c)(4) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended (the "code"). Specifically, the corporation intends to (i) provide pro bono, low-cost, or otherwise affordable legal services to juveniles; (ii) instruct and educate the public on subjects relevant to juveniles and their communities; (iii) conduct research or provide education that would benefit juveniles; and (iv) provide instruction or training for the purposes of improving or developing defense representation of juveniles.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided feedback, training and education to stakeholders and legislators regarding policy for youth involved in the juvenile court system.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.3%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.