Utah Conference Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831621366
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Bountiful, UT, USA
Phone
8015051840
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$139,097
Expenses
$139,539
Assets
$57,450

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • David Badham (President)

People named in this filing

  • David Badham (President)
  • Scott Gardner (Director)
  • Jacke Corbett (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's primary purpose is to provide accredited professional medical education as continued education to fulfill licensure requirements.In 2025, our conference took place July 30-August 1, at Snowbird Summer Resort in Utah.

What it reported doing in 2025

The "49th Annual Utah PA & NP Conference" was a 3-day conference held at the Snowbird Summer Resort in Snowbird, Utah and had 19 Speakers, 144 Conference Participants, 36 Vendors, with 4 Product Theaters. On Friday morning we hosted a Breakfast as a Networking session where participants had the opportunity to visit with colleagues. Our conference was accredited by both the American Association of Nurse Practitioners and the American Academy of Physician Associates.The conference was "Hybrid", held both in-person and virtual.Our conference planning committee is comprised of the following three Physician Associates and three Nurse Practitioners, David Badham, PA-C, Scott Gardner, PA-C, Viet Le, PA-C, Jennifer Clifton, DNP, APRN, FNP-BC, CCHP-CP, CCHP-A, FAANP, Jacke Corbett, FNP-BC, DNP, Donna Thompson, APRN, and Michael Huntsman, MBA.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.7%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.7% of revenue deployed · 99.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $139K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.