Utah Aging Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
870516417
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Phone
8015217620
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$-3,507
Expenses
$2,157
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SOMONE BLACK (PRESIDENT)
  • TONI POLICH (PRESIDENT-EL)

People named in this filing

  • BILL WHITWORTH (PAST PRESIDE)
  • SOMONE BLACK (PRESIDENT)
  • RONALD TOLMAN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Utah aging alliance was created to institute a productive partnership between older adults, multi-discipline professionals, educational institutions, students, government and businesses. It serves as a forum to increase knowledge about the triumphs and challenges of the aging process.

What it reported doing in 2024

The mission of the organization is to promote the exchange of ideas and information about aging; facilitate collegial relationships among its members through formal and informal forums; promote the knowledge of aging through research and its use in areas of practice and in the development of public policy; promote concern for ethics and a standard of excellence to guide the activities of professionals in the field of aging; advance knowledge of aging among the general public and advocate on issues of interest to older adults; and maintain a vital and viable membership organization.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -161.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.1% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -18.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.