Ut Cpr Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 333125550
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Toledo, OH, USA
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,322
- Expenses
- $2,670
- Assets
- $652
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Nishanth Siva (President)
- Yash Dixit (Vice President)
- Avishay Badirddi (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Nishanth Siva (President)
- Yash Dixit (Vice President)
- Avishay Badirddi (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
UT CPR Inc. is a student-led nonprofit organization that provides affordable CPR and Basic Life Support BLS training to students and members of the local community. The organization also conducts fundraising events to support cardiovascular health initiatives including contributions to the American Heart Association. Revenue is used to expand training access purchase equipment and sustain operations.
What it reported doing in 2025
UT CPR Inc. provided CPR and Basic Life Support BLS certification training to approximately 200 individuals including students and members of the surrounding community during the 2025 tax year. The organization focuses on delivering affordable high-quality training to increase the number of individuals equipped to respond to cardiac and medical emergencies. Program service revenue from CPR classes totaled $1,323 with approximately $915 in related program expenses. These efforts directly support the organizations mission of improving public health outcomes and increasing access to life-saving education
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 60% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 30
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.5%; rating input score 28
- Program expense ratio: 34.3%; rating input score 34
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 27.5% of revenue deployed · 34.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $915 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.