Us Climate Partnership Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 371433917
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2022231661
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,000
- Expenses
- $10,036
- Assets
- $2,838
- Liabilities
- $1,467
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAUL CICIO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- KAREN ELLIS (DIRECTOR)
- PAUL CICIO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The united states climate partnership association (uscpa) is a non-advocacy cross-industry trade association of company climate, environment, energy, and public policy management professionals. Uscpa provides a private forum for companies to manage political risk by staying abreast of policy activities at the state, federal and international levels; network with a broad array of managers from diverse companies; and meet with key policy makers and external stakeholders during our regularly scheduled workshops. As a result, uscpa is a public policy issues management resource, a global information source, and a learning organization.
What it reported doing in 2024
Uscpa provided weekly updates on climate change related legislation, regulation and state, federal and international climate initiatives to its member companies. Uscpa provided monthly one hour telephone briefings on climate change related federal, state and international actions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.52; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 99.6%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -19.4% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -27.1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.