US-China Association of High-level Professionals
Legal name: Us-china Association of High-level Professional
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270971399
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2020
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Silicon Valley, California, United States
- Phone
- +8613371872370
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $79,397
- Expenses
- $44,419
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- LIFENG WU (Director)
- XUECHENG JIN (Director)
- GUANJUN ZHANG (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
UCAHP aims to build an internationally influential professional exchange platform. By encouraging cooperation in technology innovation, education collaboration, and industrial development, the association promotes cross‑cultural understanding and long‑term global partnerships.
What it reported doing in 2020
Us-china association of high-level professionals is organized to educate professionals in technology, health, medical and educational fields, to promote collaboration among professionals, startup companies and large enterprises, venture capital firms, in the us and cross-pacific between the us and china.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.3%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 70.3%; rating input score 70
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 44.1%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -127.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -16.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -20.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 39.3% of revenue deployed · 70.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $31K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.