US Asia Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453537620
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Engineering and Technology
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $657,615
- Expenses
- $732,315
- Assets
- $493,540
- Liabilities
- $27,193
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Mary Sue Bissell (Executive DirectorSecretary): $123,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To facilitate understanding and communication between the U.S. and Asia by educating congressional members and staff; diplomats; and others from business, government, and academia through people-to-people exchanges, off-the-record briefings, networking
What it reported doing in 2022
Professional development program: American rule of law. American law students, though once again unable to travel to China and Hong Kong for a two-week period to learn firsthand about Chinas legal system, were able to participate in a virtual program. This program found them meeting with law professors and students, government and non-government institutions, lawyers and businessmen in Hong Kong, shanghai , Beijing and Shenzhen. The interactive discussions provided them with a basic knowledge of China and Hong Kongs legal systems, allowing for comparisons to the us rule of law. This was the sixth year of this program. Chinese Rule of Law. The Chinese rule of law program brought Chinese law students from three top Chinese universities Tsinghua, Peking University School for Transnational Law and Shanghai Jiao Tongto the US (two in-person and 5 virtually) The students were able to meet with Members and staff of Congress, judges at all levels, law students, practicing lawyers, think tanks and others to gain insight into the U.S. rule of law system This was the 16th year the program was held. Youth Development ProgramsThe US-Asia Institute continued two youth development programs for Filipino American and Thai American young leaders and launched a third for Mongolian American young leaders.IMPACT! USAI continued a youth empowerment program for Filipino American young people to provide them the opportunity to build a stronger understanding of how the US government works and how they can make a difference by becoming actively engaged in their communities. The participants were placed in virtual internships around Washington DC to engage with policy and thought leaders firsthand. Six participants were selected with all participating in person The Thai American National Internship Program (TANIP) returned in 2022 with 4 students, all in-person.The Mongolian-US National Civic Engagement Program (MUNCEP) was launched in 2022 with 5 students participating, all in-person US-Asia Institute Internship Program. 20 outstanding young people from around the globe participated in the US-Asia Institutes internship program in 2022. From special high school mentoring programs to short term mini-mester experiences to part and full-time internships, the USAI served as a unique training ground for aspiring young professionals to learn firsthand how government works and the interaction between the government, business, academic and diplomatic communities. The internship was bolstered by weekly Lunch and Learns where USAI trustees, advisors, and contacts offered their unique insights into various issues, career paths, and more. The USAI internship network coupled with the other professional development programs numbers more than 1,000 members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 72%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.4%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.8%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.9% of revenue deployed · 72% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $527K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $123K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.