Urban Schoolhouse
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270199763
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Oakland, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5104631644
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Child Day Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $135,315
- Expenses
- $116,431
- Assets
- $49,896
- Liabilities
- $34,349
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GISELLE A AMPUERO DE ALEGUIRE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GISELLE A AMPUERO DE ALEGUIRE (PRESIDENT)
- HEATHER HOLLIGER (SECRETARY/TR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A nurturing educational community
What it reported doing in 2024
From 01/01/24 to 12/31/24, urban schoolhouse's "community resilience program" continued to provide support to local community-based organizations, serving child care providers, children and low-income families, by hosting a drop-off site for in-kind donations of urgently needed essentials. In-kind donations were collected and delivered to these organizations weekly by urban schoolhouse staff. These efforts have grown to serve over 1000 families weekly through 10 distribution points.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 63% for direct work, and 37% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 94%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.69; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.9% of revenue deployed · 94% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $109K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.