Urban League of Essex County Opportunity Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475608316
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Newark, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9736249535
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $210,504
- Expenses
- $215,864
- Assets
- $7,238,961
- Liabilities
- $6,981,165
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VIVIAN COX FRASER (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
People named in this filing
- DIANE BORRADAILE (CHAIR)
- ANNIE SNEED-GODFREY (SECRETARY)
- JASMINE CORDERO (MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organizations mission is to encourage and support community development, combat community deterioration, promote community stability, and assist communities throughout essex county, New Jersey in the planning, and development of workforce husing, special needs housing and decent affordable housing for low and moderate income families.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization encourages and supports community development, combats community deterioration, promotes community stability, and assists communities throughout essex county, New Jersey in the planning, development, creation, management and maintaining workforce housing, special needs housing and decent affordable housing for low income and moderate income individuals and families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.1%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 90.8%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.5%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 33.53; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.96; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 54.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 65.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.1% of revenue deployed · 90.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $196K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $2.6M reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.