Urban Innovation21
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260379369
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2009
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4122810102
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Economic Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,844,138
- Expenses
- $1,724,900
- Assets
- $851,356
- Liabilities
- $573,179
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM GENERETT JR (PRESIDENT AND CEO (EXITED 8/2017))
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM GENERETT JR (PRESIDENT AND CEO (EXITED 8/2017)): $153,458 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Urban innovation21, administrator of the pittsburgh central keystone innovation zone (pckiz) is a public-private partnership that boosts regional economic development through 21st century innovation-driven entrepreneurship. Urban innovation21 links successful innovation economy clusters with the needs and assets of underserved communities by designing and implementing programs, building strategic bridges and teaming up with existing organizations and initiatives. Urban innovation21 believes that an inclusive innovation economy is key in increasing regional competitiveness and sustainability.because of its success and creativity in administering the kiz program, urban innovation21 was renamed in january of 2012 by then, pckiz board of directors, to increase the breadth of the pckiz's work and to support initiatives that are outside the defined boundary of the pckiz.
What it reported doing in 2017
Pwas: since 2012, urban innovation21 has recognized the strong entrepreneurial spirit in the hill district and homewood communities by hosting a small business grant competition. In the spring of 2017, urban innovation21 expanded its business development programming to the northside community. To date, $650,000 in grants have been awarded to 75 businesses in those communities. In addition to grants, ui21 has provided these companies with a wide array of business support to help them grow their businesses. The fall 2016 grant competition awarded $120,000 in grants to winners of the inclusive innovation community-based business grant competition, and these grants were funded through support from the richard king mellon foundation and upmc health plan. Awards ranged from $5,000 to $10,000. Six hill district businesses won: living juicy, ans billing, and errands made easy existed previously while tdc contracting, communion llc, and tds productions entered as start-up companies. Nine businesses represented homewood: roland ford productions, the professional barber institute, knotzland, strong's cleaners, and big lulu's trucking were pre-existing and drafting dreams, natural choice, jazmeen style, and luminaria productions (film producers and studios) were start-ups. The spring 2017 northside grant competition awarded $50,000 to community based entrepreneurs, and these grants were funded through the support of neighborhood allies and our public private partnership. There were seven businesses that won the northside grant competition where the awards ranged from $5,000 to $10,000. Arnold's tea, malaika's learning center, and roxanne's catering won as existing businesses; while morris tires, resus technologies, the pit shop and revival chili won the competition as start-up companies. Hill districtas of september of 2017, urban innovation21 is pleased to announce that 79% of the businesses supported by ui21 through its hill district grant competitions are still in business. Of the 28 businesses that ui21 has supported through its community based grant competitions, 2 companies have gone out of business, 2 businesses are dormant, and 2 businesses are on hold. Twenty-two out of twenty-eight (22/28) companies are still in business. Our success rate of 79% is significantly higher than the national average, which ranges from 10% to 50%, depending on the source. The increase in gross revenue for the hill district business grant competition winners is $766,903 and the number of jobs created by these businesses is 27.our work in the hill district does not just involve providing grants and other entrepreneurial support to businesses. We have used our funding to leverage hundreds of thousands of dollars in funding from other sources. For example, ui21 is a key partner in the greater hill district growth development fund. For the 2016 grant cycle, three hill district business were awarded a $10,000 grant to contribute to their business operations. The greater hill district growth development fund has contributed to major economic and cultural projects in the hill district since 2013 that include the jeron grayson community center, hill cdc, hill house, and shop-n-save grocery store. Hill district business associationthroughout '15-'16, the hill district business association hosted quarterly meetings in the hill district that were well attended and provided information on business opportunities that included grants and contracts. Currently, the officers selected for the business association are scheduling events to keep the community and members engaged throughout the calendar year. Meeting and mixers will be hosted in the hill district as well as surrounding communities i.e. Northside, downtown, and oakland to attract additional business to the hill district. The goal is to expand business interest and business-to-business deals to create awareness and promote businesses stemming from the hill district. In the fall of 2017, the president of the h
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 91.2%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $232.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.5%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.67; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.3% of revenue deployed · 91.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $153K · 12 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.