Urban Impact Initiative Massachusetts

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
882475699
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Springfield, MA, USA
Phone
4133319355
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$271,735
Expenses
$271,735
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JYNAI MCDONALD (FOUNDING CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JYNAI MCDONALD (FOUNDING CEO): $65,956 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Urban Impact is dedicated to prioritizing the reduction of the impact of poverty for families in the Commonwealth. The organization offers a plethora of small business corporate and community opportunities. These opportunities include workforce development with re-entry services substance use recovery support womens health digital equity small business assistance DEI workshops and youth services.

What it reported doing in 2024

Re-Entry Program Overview: Empowering Returning Women Citizens At Urban Impact we are committed to providing meaningful opportunities for women currently incarcerated or returning to society. Our Re-Entry Program focuses on delivering work readiness and employment placement services. We understand the unique challenges these women face and our program is designed to meet their needs with culturally conscious services that empower them for success. Work Readiness Training: Our comprehensive training partnership with early behind-the-wall interactions is tailored to equip participants with the essential skills and knowledge needed to navigate todays job market. From resume building and interview preparation to workplace communication and problem-solving we provide the foundation necessary for women to thrive in their careers. Job Search Strategy: Our program offers valuable job search strategies to maximize your chances of success. Whether its learning how to network effectively use online job boards or approach companies directly we equip you with the skills to make your job search more effective and efficient. Culturally Conscious Support: Recognizing the unique experiences of women from different backgrounds our program integrates culturally responsive services that acknowledge and celebrate their identities. By centering their needs we help to ensure that each woman has the resources support and mentorship needed to overcome obstacles and succeed in their chosen careers. Resume and Cover Letter Enhancement: Our team helps you build on your resume whether your experience is limited or extensive so your resume can stand out and have a cover letter tailored to the specific job youre applying for. We ensure that your experience and skills are presented in the best possible light to attract employers. Career Advancement Focus: Our goal is not just to place women in jobs but to help them build lasting careers. We help program participants create a career strategy whether they are returning to work after a lengthy absence or entering the workforce for the first time. Urban Impacts goal is both personal and professional growth to navigate workplace challenges to ensure continued employment success and upward mobility. Wrap-around supports have included housing assistance access to health care & food security training assistance transportation support and retention incentives. Urban Impact has exceeded their placement and outcome goals by engaging up to 100 women to pre-employment training behind the wall approximately 50 women with customer service training certificates behind-the-wall placing approximately 20 women in employment and providing support services for them to retain their jobs or scale up to a new opportunity and training.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.2%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 71.2%; rating input score 71
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.2% of revenue deployed · 71.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $193K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $66K · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 40 of 43 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX FeesForServicesProfFundraising column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.