Urban Health Perspectives

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263573930
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
Location
Decatur, GA, USA
Phone
7342775054
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$160,000
Expenses
$160,000
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kenya Jackson (President/Co -Founder)

People named in this filing

  • Kenya Jackson (President/Co -Founder)
  • Danielle Dupuy (Co-Founder)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization advances health by addressing the social determinants of health through community violence intervention (CVI) strategies in Metro Atlanta and strengthening coordinated, community-based responses to violence. Through fiscal sponsorship and direct program activities, the organization supports hospital- and community-based violence intervention efforts focused on reducing reinjury, retaliation, and the long-term impacts of violence. During the reporting period, the organization fiscally sponsored two community-based initiatives, administering program resources to support direct services, outreach, and community engagement aligned with its mission. Program activities emphasized: Immediate and long-term stabilization for individuals at high risk of violence Trauma-informed care and wraparound support services Community-based outreach and engagement Workforce development and capacity building for violence intervention practitioners Strengthening coordination across the Metro

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization advanced community violence intervention (CVI) efforts in Metro Atlanta by addressing social determinants of health and supporting coordinated, community-based responses to violence. During the year, the organization served as a fiscal sponsor for two community-based initiatives and administered program funds to support direct services, outreach, and community engagement. Activities included trauma-informed service delivery, participant stabilization support such as transportation and food access, workforce development for violence intervention practitioners, and collaboration across partners to reduce reinjury and retaliation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 69% for direct work, and 31% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.6%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 90.6%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.6% of revenue deployed · 90.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $145K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.