Urban Health Partnerships Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453332540
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Phone
7862242309
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,633,420
Expenses
$1,902,767
Assets
$319,504
Liabilities
$188,656

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREA IGLESIAS PSYD (CEO EXEC. DI)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDREA IGLESIAS PSYD (CEO EXEC. DI): $103,688 total reported compensation
  • ARELY LOZANO (DIRECTOR OF): $70,294 total reported compensation
  • WREN RUIZ (SENIOR COMMU): $64,999 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Urban health oartnerships' mission is to invest in our communities by co- designing sustainable change and promoting health and well-bing across the life span. Our vision is to build communities where everyone can lead healthier and happier lives through physical, social and emotional well-being.

What it reported doing in 2024

A. Ivertown parks group the overtown parks group is a group of overtown residents and community partners that have joined together to form a new subcommittee of the overtown children and youth committee (ocyc), called, overtown healthy parks & public spaces community group, or "overtown parks group for short. Urban health partnerships (uhp) and catalyst miami are supporting the facilitation of the group, bringing together people who are interested in helping to improve overtown parks" ability to provide health spaces and activities. The overtown parks group is focused on advancing community-driven solutions, programs and policies that improve and bring investment into overtown parks. The parks already serve as key places for people to gather for recreation, for exercise, and to access occasional services like food distributions, health fairs, and support services. B. In community the in community initiative, a project led by uhp and funded by the national institute of health aims to improve health outcomes particularly within the lgbtq+ community in miami-dade county through community engagement and partnerships focusing on improved healthcare access and overall quality of life. C miami-dade county age friendly initiative the miami-dade age-friendly initiative(afi) is a collaborative effort focused on sustainable changes and efforts in order to create a community where older adults of all ages can stay active, engaged, and lealthy with dignity and enjoyment. Miami-dade county recently joined the aarp network of age-friendly communities, making it the fifth-largest community in the country to join the network. Guided by the miami-dade age-friendly initiative the community has been implementing a collective impact framework to meet the needs of older adults since 2012.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -16.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.6%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 17.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $104K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.