Upward Transitions Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 730590277
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4052325507
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,159,752
- Expenses
- $1,138,292
- Assets
- $1,948,632
- Liabilities
- $23,100
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRANDON KEMP (PRESIDENT)
- MELINDA MERIDETH (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- DANA GIROUX (VICE PRESIDENT)
- PERIANN PULLIAM (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- PERIANN PULLIAM (CEO): $80,738 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The agency fulfilled this mission by providing a hand up to 4,139 such persons in the okc metro area. Those helped included families and individuals receiving case management, transportation assistance, rent and utility assistance, emergency travel assistance due to domestic violence and human trafficking, and replacement/retrieval of legal documents like birth certificates and driver licenses needed for employment, housing, and public assistance. These forms of help made it possible for referred clients who are homeless or on the verge of becoming so to complete the programs of referral agencies and obtain and/or preserve their place called home. Our goal is to not only place them on a path to self-sufficiency but to place them on a path to sustainable self-sufficiency.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community outreach program - this program provided 4,139 persons with transportation assistance, government approved identification cards/replacement drivers licenses, rental assistance and utility assistance.transportation assistance was provided to those who do and do not own their transportation. For those who do own their own transportation and can show proof of a driver's license and auto insurance, we will issue gas cards for social service and medical appointments and/or those who have recently secured employment and require assistance to purchase fuel until they receive their first paycheck. Gas cards were issued to 33 clients during fy25. For those without their own transportation, we issue bus passes. Bus passes were issued to 621 clients for job interviews, social service and medical appointments, and transportation to and from work. Transportation assistance is also provided to persons who are stranded and those who are victims of domestic violence or human trafficking. Those with their own transportation are issued gas vouchers and those without are provided with bus tickets to their destination; thereby reconnecting them with their support systems.many of the clients served come to upward transitions (ut) to obtain birth certificates or government identification credentials. 1,245 birth certificates were ordered, 1,079 were received and 868 were picked up by clients; an 80.4% pick up rate. 1,551 government identification cards or replacement driver licenses were authorized and 1,142 clients picked them up; a 73.6% pick up rate. This is an important first step in accessing housing assistance, employment, and public assistance.ut's rental assistance program paid past due rent for 600 people living in 186 households to halt eviction. Ut's rental deposit program made it possible for 65 people in 35 households to obtain public housing. Ut's utility assistance program preserved or restored electricity, gas and/or water for 103 people living in 30 households.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 62% for direct work, and 38% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.5%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 86%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.06 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.5% of revenue deployed · 86% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $979K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $81K · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.