Uptown 23Rd District Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
454611815
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Phone
4052378021
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$142,441
Expenses
$100,113
Assets
$54,988

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CASSI POOR (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TROY HUMPHREY (VP)
  • STEPHEN TYLER (TREASURER)
  • MISHA GOLI (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the common good and general welfare of the uptown 23rd district and the surrounding community by promoting and fostering projects, increasing attendance within the area, and developing plans and programs for the purpose of maintaining and improving the uptown 23rd district.

What it reported doing in 2024

Uptown 23rd district association provided 'safe and clean' services as a business improvement district to further sustainablily and overall promotion for the district. This includes district management, social media marketiong of the district, security and street cleaning. Hosted 2 charity giveback nights. Hosted 4th annual uptown outside. Committee created a new program entitled merchant resource workshops and hosted 5 of them. Committee applied 5 grants and was awarded the 2025 route 66 revitalization grant administered through the Oklahoma department of commerce.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Assets have declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.5%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 96%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.7%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 42%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.7% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.5% of revenue deployed · 96% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $96K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.