Upsilon Lambda Chapter of Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
770621980
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Phone
9043161551
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Men's Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$83,296
Expenses
$85,407
Assets
$95,723

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Gregory D Bostic (President)
  • Dweise A Harris (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Gregory D Bostic (President)
  • Dweise A Harris (Vice President)
  • Brian Foster (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Developing young men into leaders of the community, promoting brotherhood among members, rewarding academic excellence, fostering youth education and training, promoting personal progress and good character, and conducting charitable activities that benefit families.

What it reported doing in 2024

Youth Mentoring Programs: Men of Valor, GTHSGTC, Project Alpha, and FYILS. Provided several hours of training to several students, awarded them I-pads, books, jackets, sweatshirts, a recreation trip and certificates.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 11
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 10.9%; rating input score 11
  • Program expense ratio: 10.7%; rating input score 11

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.5%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -25.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 10.9% of revenue deployed · 10.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.