Upper Laurel Community Organization Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562215746
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Mars Hill, NC, USA
- Phone
- 8287774454
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $186,483
- Expenses
- $172,166
- Assets
- $201,489
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Col Robert J Smith Jr (President)
- Pamela Cody (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Col Robert J Smith Jr (President)
- Pamela Cody (Vice President)
- Marsha Boyd (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
ULCO operates Ebbs Chapel Community Center whose mission is to serve youth, families, and seniors with programs, activities, and essential services in the Upper Laurel Community in Mars Hill, NC.
What it reported doing in 2025
Food Pantry - 311 people received food, cleaning supplies, diapers and other baby supplies, pet food, and more. This includes emergency aid during Tropical Storm Helene. Food is donated by local donors and weekly by the MANNA Food Bank out of Asheville, NC. All program operations are staffed by volunteers. No monies from grants were specifically for food pantry.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 2
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 1.6%; rating input score 2
- Program expense ratio: 1.7%; rating input score 2
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 32.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 87.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 92.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 1.6% of revenue deployed · 1.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.