Upper Arlington Commission on Aging
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311242713
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-T 2023
- Location
- Columbus, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6145835326
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $102,631
- Expenses
- $100,788
- Assets
- $69,241
- Liabilities
- $5,506
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER CAMERON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- JENNIFER CAMERON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- BRYAN ENGLAND (CHAIR)
- KLODIANA TEDESCO (VICE CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The upper arlington commission on aging exists to educate, enrich, and empower the lives ofolder adults in upper arlington and beyond. The commission will identify and work to resolve issues faced by older adults as well as advocate on their behalf.
What it reported doing in 2024
Keep seniors safe in their community with i am fine - daily phone calls to senior citizens who live alone to ensure they have not fallen or become ill; and file of life - medical information packet. Keep seniors healthy as they age in place with ua village - a wrap-around program that assists with activities that make aging in place difficult; medicare counseling and annual presentations; monthly educational events on topics of interest and importance to the aging population. Provide daily information and referrals in response to inquiries.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 50
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.3%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 51.3%; rating input score 51
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.3% of revenue deployed · 51.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $52K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.