Upper Adams Jaycees
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237426026
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Biglerville, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7176777820
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $667,627
- Expenses
- $297,700
- Assets
- $3,149,629
- Liabilities
- $39,525
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
32 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- BRIYELL BRETZMAN-SCHRIVER (UAJ-VP,OCP/N): $909 total reported compensation
- ADAM LITTLE (UAJ/OCP-DIR,): $255 total reported compensation
- BRANDEE LITTLE (NAHF - CHAIR): $255 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization is civic service through the organized efforts of the young people of the upper adams county community to promote the welfare of the community and its citizens through active, constructive projects. It is the further purpose of the organization to provide the young people constituting its membership with training in leadership and civic consciousness to better their usefulness as citizens. The organization is non-partisan affecting the community welfare.
What it reported doing in 2024
External affairs - expenses associated with events for the community including senior citizens dances, holiday projects, scholarships, and donations to local organizations and internal affairs - expenses associated with events and programs for the organization's members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 90% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.5%; rating input score 36
- Program expense ratio: 69.3%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 55.4%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.58; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.5%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.5% of revenue deployed · 69.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 41 of 41 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $206K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $909 · 32 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.