Upmc Mckeesport Medical Staff Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274836619
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Mckeesport, PA, USA
Phone
4126646755
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$255,985
Expenses
$237,796
Assets
$838,411
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

31 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAUL DAFE OGOGAN MD (President)
  • SANN YU MON MD (Vice President)
  • ANDY RUSH (President)

People named in this filing

  • TRACEY CONTI MD (MEMBER AT LARGE)
  • ALLISON VOGL MD (MEMBER AT LARGE)
  • BHAWNA AGARWAL MD (MEMBER AT LARGE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Upmc mckeesport medical staff fund is a membership organization of physicians practicing various medical disciplines who serve as members of the medical staff of the upmc mckeesport, a 501(c)(3) hospital entity. Membership is open to all physicians on the medical staff of upmc mckeesport. The purpose of the organization is to provide support for the continuing education, health programs, and professional recognition of medical staff, medical interns, and residents rotating for training through the hospital, nursing staff, and other medical professionals associated with upmc mckeesport. Support is provided through professional funding, either to the medical professionals directly, or to upmc mckeesport and its related 501(c)(3) foundation, for educational materials, classes, conferences, and other professional development opportunities. These activities are intended to ensure that medical professionals maintain the highest level of clinical expertise in order to provide the highest stan

What it reported doing in 2024

Provided funding to upmc mckeesport hospital to support the educational activities of the family residency program, including stipends for medical professionals attending monthly medical education meetings and funding for two medical professionals to attend educational conferences. Also provided support to various local charitable organizations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 42% for direct work, and 58% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has grown recently. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 53
  • Accountability: 58
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 98.3%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.1%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.53; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.6% of revenue deployed · 98.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $234K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 31 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 17 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.