Uplift Johnson County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 854358964
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Greenwood, IN, USA
- Phone
- 3178817575
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Personal Social Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $169,106
- Expenses
- $218,792
- Assets
- $67,894
- Liabilities
- $8,280
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WENDY MCCLELLAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- DUSTIN BRENTON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DAVID MAURER (BOARD MEMBER)
- ANYA MCCONNELL (BOARD MEMBER)
- WENDY MCCLELLAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Uplift johnson county is a service organization founded on the principle of "see a need, seek to fill it." our mission is to identify needs within our community and seek to provide volunteer and/or fundraising support, while providing everyday people with the opportunity to serve others through volunteerism. Individuals, businesses, service organizations, or any other group can nominate an individual or group in need, and uplift will come alongside them to provide outreach, fundraising and coordination of events or activities to fill the need. We are a single contact point for individuals and other nonprofits to come partner with us and fill needs in our community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -29.4%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 37.5% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.