Up Theater Company Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273236745
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6462963181
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $60,208
- Expenses
- $68,066
- Assets
- $22,519
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID HENDERSON (President)
People named in this filing
- KIRBY FIELDS (ARTIST DIRECTOR)
- LAURA F BOSLEY (MANAGING DIR.)
- MARTIN COLLINS (Executive Dir.)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Theatre and education
What it reported doing in 2024
Dead of Winter Reading SeriesLocation: Ft. Washington Collegiate CampusDate(s): January 7, 14, 21, 28 2025Description: On four January evenings, UP presents free, exploratory readings of four new plays in various stages of development. These readings always incorporatetalk-backs between the audience and playwrights. - FLOATING DOWN TO CAMELOT by Steven Satta, directed by Janice Goldberg.A gay love story set on a liberal-arts college campus in the 70's.- WISH BONE by Phoebe Farber, directed by Betsy True. A young woman withbig dreams navigates various factions in her job at a chicken-processing plant.- TUMBLEWEED by Marcus Scott, directed by Dev Bondarin. A young black girlwith hair like a tumbleweed faces various standards of beauty both within andout of her immediate family.- BREAD OF LIFE by Frank Pagliaro, directed by Kirby Fields. An unorthodoxtelling of the story of Christ.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.7%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 50.1%; rating input score 50
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.1%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -33.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.7% of revenue deployed · 50.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $34K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.