Up & Forward Care Support Fndtn Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922540531
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Ithaca, NY, USA
Phone
5703960847
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Public Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$100
Expenses
$524
Assets
$2,875

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIM EVANOSKI (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KIM EVANOSKI (PRESIDENT)
  • WENDY REYNOLDS (TREASURER)
  • HALEY EVANOSKI (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation is formed for the charitable purpose of alleviating poverty, specifically: (a) soliciting charitable contributions for the benefit of poor, distressed, and at-risk care workers providing health and human services; (b) providing income-assistance in the form of grants to address economic insecurity affecting such care workers including, but not limited to, ensuring accessibility to food, housing, transportation, healthcare, childcare, safety, and education; (c) coordinating provision of subsidized or reduced-cost services for the benefit of such care workers to enable them to obtain and maintain stable employment; (d) empowering care workers to attain economic stability by offering educational, employment, and vocational counseling; and (e) conducting any and all lawful activities which may be necessary or useful for advancement and promotion of education in the arts in the furtherance, accomplishment or attainment of the foregoing purposes.

What it reported doing in 2025

Foundation is in its first year of existence and has not yet had an accomplishment of its exempt purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -424%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.49; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -131% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.