Unspoken Angels Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462595451
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
East Point, GA, USA
Phone
4044949788
Rating
41
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protection Against Abuse

Reported finances

Revenue
$127,097
Expenses
$249,039
Assets
$97,054
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Eudoxie Bridges (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Karma Bridges (Governance)
  • Eudoxie Bridges (Executive Director)
  • Amandine Ogouebandija Epse Deniel (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's purposes are, generally, to support and to empower survivors of domestic abuse, giving them a voice and creating a safe haven where they can heal, thrive, and rebuild their lives with dignity and hope and, specifically, to provide a range of essential services, including emergency shelter, counseling, legal aid, and educational programs and to stimulate long-term change by building schools, shelters, and water wells, to ensure that no child or woman is left without access to services that meet basic human needs.

What it reported doing in 2025

A nonprofit organization that supports, educates, inspires, and empowers young ladies and children who have endured mental, verbal and sexual abuse.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -95.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -45.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.8% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.