Unm Sandoval Regional Medical Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271368727
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Phone
5059947000
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$42,861,743
Expenses
$56,859,563
Assets
$175,146,694
Liabilities
$156,127,628

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the overall health of the community we serve by providing the highest quality healthcare services available that meet the needs of sandoval county's diverse population.

What it reported doing in 2012

Unm sandoval regional medical center is organized for the development, construction, and operation of a licensed general, community teaching hospital to be located in sandoval county, New Mexico in suppport of and under the operating aegis of the health sciences center of the university of New Mexico and, in connection therewith to facilitate and develop the clinical and medical practices of the faculty of the university of New Mexico school of medicine; to secure such other clinical and office facilities to support such a general, community teaching hospital; to perform business functions related to staffing and operating such a general, community teaching hospital, including, without limitation, employment, payroll, contracting, and fiscal services; and to perform such other functions as are determined to be reasonable to promote the social welfare of New Mexico through theadvancement of health care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 67
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 42.9%; rating input score 43; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -32.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.08; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.89; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 6 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $612K · 22 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 43/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.