Unlimited Door Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200448713
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$118,431
Expenses
$50,900
Assets
$69,831
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sherika Daniel (CEO Director)

People named in this filing

  • Sherika Daniel (CEO Director)
  • Elizabeth Daniel (CFO)
  • Thomas Johnson (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Unlimited Door Foundation Inc. provides volunteer services for vital causes like feeding the hungry and offering temporary housing funds for the homeless in hotels in Atlanta Georgia. The organization supports youth and families by offering essential services for growth and a healthy environment. Services include scholarship programs school supplies food and clothing donations to schools and families in need mentoring programs donations to school sports programs and golf camps.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our organization is dedicated to serving the homeless population by providing essential food supplies and supporting community welfare through financial contributions. We have observed a significant 130% increase in the number of homeless individuals receiving meals from our programs compared to the previous year indicative of the expanding impact of all our community initiatives.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 46%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 57%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.37; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 54.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $54K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.