Univirtual School Without Borders Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
874317611
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
9176566012
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,831
Expenses
$39,444
Assets
$61,387
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Marina Kolesnik (President and Director)
  • Ronit Fuhrmann (Vice President and Director)

People named in this filing

  • Marina Kolesnik (President and Director)
  • Ronit Fuhrmann (Vice President and Director)
  • Alisa Belyakova (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our organization receives a substantial part of its support from gifts and grants described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). ( Part III, Line 28: In 2022 we began working with Aspire Public Schools, EIN: 94-3311088, creating and teaching Physics and Unity coding after-school enrichment programs for their middle school students, who are mainly from low-income families or underrepresented populations. The grant we received from the Tides Foundation was given to us to specifically work with Aspire students from low-income families during 2022 and 2023.

What it reported doing in 2022

We have designed an education program and provided science education to 33 students from low-income families in 2022. the program is ready to deliver our science program to additional 167 students in 2023. in 2022 we only saw a fraction of expenditures on this program. Most expenses will be incurred in 2023.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 39.6%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 60.9%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 39.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $39K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.