University of Western Australia in America Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203164978
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Brightwaters, NY, USA
Phone
2124504131
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
University or Technological Institute

Reported finances

Revenue
$18
Expenses
$100,464
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN WILLINGE (PRESIDENT & DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN WILLINGE (PRESIDENT & DIRECTOR)
  • SARAH BESHAR (TREASURER, SECRETARY & DIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization was formed to 1)provide for exchange programs (for students and faculty members) between univ. Of western australia and academic institutions in the USA; 2)provide for lectures, alumni events, fundraisers, publishing of books and materials and engaging in other such programs that will integrate the univ. Of western australia with academic institutions, alumni and other friends and supporters based in the USA; 3)support educational programs at the univ. Of western australia, as well as fellowships and scholarships, and the establishment of educational faculties and institutions, endowed chairs, and such other programs as will enrich the academic integrity of the univ. Of western australia; 4) support the construction and renovation of new and existing buildings at the univ. Of western australia; 5)administer the funds of the org. On a nondiscriminatory and interdenominational basis and not to restrict the use of such funds to people of any race, faith, color or creed.

What it reported doing in 2021

The organization raises funds in order to make grants to the university of western australia.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 94.3%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -558,033.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -38.6% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -87.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $95K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.