University of Nigeria Medical Alumni Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922424699
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Solon, OH, USA
Phone
7135740043
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alumni Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,404
Expenses
$9,121
Assets
$2,283
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • OKWUDILI CHUKWUANI (CHAIRMAN, GARF)
  • BENJAMIN MOZIE (CLASS REPRESENTATIVE)
  • CHIMARAOKE EDEOGA (CLASS REPRESENTATIVE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Supporting the training of medical personnel, research, and clinical services at the university of nigeria teaching hospital and the college of medicine of the university of nigeria, ituku-ozalla campus, nigeria. This involves the following: provision of educational resources (virtual and physical), provision of lecture halls and accommodation for the medical students, provision of equipment and supplies to facilitate optimal clinical services and research at the teaching hospital.

What it reported doing in 2025

We completed a hostel to accommodate medical students at the university of nigeria teaching hospital, ituku ozalla-$93,820.14. We paid for an annual subscription for two-500-participant zoom platform - $1612.29 we paid for packing, handling, and transportation of donated equipment and supplies to the university of nigeria teaching hospital - $17,177.75

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -152% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -192.4% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.