University of Maryland Faculty Physicians, Inc.
Legal name: University of Maryland Emergency Medicine Associates Pa
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521403415
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Baltimore, MD, US
- Phone
- 410-328-8919
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,447,525
- Expenses
- $29,791,151
- Assets
- $11,254,935
- Liabilities
- $6,347,837
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Brian Browne MD (PRESIDENT)
- Michael Winters MD (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- Brian Browne MD (PRESIDENT): $618,022 total reported compensation
- Michael Winters MD (VICE PRESIDENT): $528,535 total reported compensation
- Daniel Lemkin MD (Physician): $417,248 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Under the medical service plan of the university of Maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical instruction for medical students and other trainees and to deliver healthcare to the general public without regard to the patient's ability to pay for services.
University of Maryland Faculty Physicians, Inc. (UM FPI) is the multi-specialty physician practice affiliated with the University of Maryland School of Medicine. Serving patients across Maryland, UM FPI provides comprehensive medical care through a network of locations offering services ranging from primary care and urgent care to specialized orthopedics, cancer care, and women's health. The organization is recognized for clinical excellence, with over 120 faculty physicians named Baltimore magazine Top Doctors in 2024 and its ambulatory surgery center ranked among the best in the nation by Newsweek.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.9%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 84.9% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $618K · 15 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.