University of Louisiana Monroe Facilities Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201116697
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Monroe, LA, USA
Phone
3183421961
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Student Services, Organizations of Students

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,812,122
Expenses
$15,828,034
Assets
$88,141,849
Liabilities
$55,929,169

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAN ROBERTSON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAN ROBERTSON (PRESIDENT)
  • L J HOLLAND (VICE PRESIDE)
  • CHRIS RINGO (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide student housing & other student facilities for the university of Louisiana monroe campus.

What it reported doing in 2024

The university of Louisiana monroe facilities was formed for the benefit of the university of Louisiana monroe and its principal purpose is to coordinate, construct, and finance the development of facilities on the campus of the university of Louisiana at monroe and to oversee the management of such facilities. Certain operations are regulated by the board of supervisors for the university of Louisiana system, the Louisiana local government environmental facilities and community development authority, and regions bank through the provisions of a ground and buildings lease agreement, a facilities lease agreement, a loan and assignment agreement, and a trust indenture, including amendments and supplements, as applicable. The university of Louisiana monroe facilities has completed the new construction and/or renovation of some ten (10) housing units, student health center, student union, the clarke m. Williams student success center, and the installation/construction of scoreboards, chair-back seating, and dugouts at various athletic venues on the campus of university of Louisiana monroe and the installation of two electronic display boards. In 2014, the university of Louisiana monroe facilities has entered into agreements to install new artificial turf and drainage system for malone stadium; development of a doppler radar facility; and construction of the international student facility. In 2015, the university of monroe facilities has entered into agreements with the university of Louisiana at monroe and the university of Louisiana monroe athletic foundation, inc. To construct the field house at the university of Louisiana monroe malone stadium. Also in 2015, the organization has entered into contracts for the construction of the doppler radar; renovation of masur hall; and paving of commons ii parking lot; all on the campus of the university of Louisiana monroe. In 2016, the organization completed installation of the new artificial turf and drainage system as well as the field house at the university of Louisiana monroe malone stadium. In addition, the renovation of masur hall and the paving of commons ii parking lot was completed in 2016. The organization entered into a ground lease and a facilities lease agreement in 2016 for the purpose of developing, designing, renovating and constructing a student center on the campus of the university of Louisiana monroe. In 2017, the organization entered into a ground lease and a facilities lease agreement for the purpose of acquiring, designing, developing, constructing and renovating the reconstruction of brown stadium and parking adjacent thereto on the campus of the university of Louisiana at monroe. During the year ended june 30, 2018, the doppler radar and student event center were completed. Also, during the year ended june 30, 2018, the facilities entered into a ground and facilities lease agreement with the board of supervisors of ulm, on behalf of ulm, for the purpose of constructing, designing, testing, surveying, and equipping an area of malone stadium into a new athletic treatment facility. This new athletic treatment facility was completed during the year ended june 30, 2019. Also, during the year ended june 30, 2019, the facilities entered into a ground and facilities lease agreement with the board of supervisors for the university of Louisiana system, on behalf of ulm, for the purpose of developing and constructing a golf house and the wally jones golf complex. The reconstruction of brown stadium and parking adjacent thereto were completed during the year ended june 30, 2020. Also, during the year ended june 30, 2020, the wally jones golf complex was completed. During the year ended june 30, 2021, the organization entered into a ground and facilities lease agreement with the board, on behalf of ulm, for the purpose of construction, developing, designing, constructing, and equipping the new student hub facility. This project was completed in august of 2022 and the faciliti

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 71% for direct work, and 29% for affiliated organizations.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -23.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.57; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.63; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.