University Faculty Associates Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463969536
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fresno, CA, USA
Phone
5594535200
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Health Systems

Reported finances

Revenue
$50,975,557
Expenses
$55,911,364
Assets
$6,827,793
Liabilities
$2,707,733

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIELLE CAMPAGNE MD (PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN)

People named in this filing

  • DANIELLE CAMPAGNE MD (PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN)
  • SUSANNE SPANO MD (DIRECTOR)
  • PATRICK MACMILLAN MD (SECRETARY/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's mission is to: promote health in California's central valley region (i) through the provision of quality health care services and the clinical training and education of medical residents, fellows, and students; (ii) by improving the quality, effectiveness, and accessibility of health care services; (iii) promote health in ca's central valley region by developing and expanding key partnerships with stakeholders to create a sustainable health care delivery model; (iv) through the provision of certain health care management and administrative services to facilitate the effective delivery of health care services; (v) promote and carry on scientific and medical research through clinical and population-based studies; (vi) promote and carry on health educational activities in ca's central valley region; and (vii) promote and carry on such activities as may be deemed reasonable and necessary for the promotion and betterment of health in ca's central valley region.

What it reported doing in 2024

Promoted health in California's central valley by improving the quality, effectiveness, and accessibility of healthcare services. Developed and expanded key partnerships with stakeholders to create a sustainable healthcare delivery model. Promoted health in California's central valley region through the provision of certain healthcare management and administrative services that facilitated the effective delivery of healthcare services. Promoted and carried on scientific and medical research through clinical and population-based studies. Promoted and carried on health educational activities in California's central valley region. Promoted and carried on such other activities as was deemed reasonable and necessary for the promotion and betterment of health in California's central valley region.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 51
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.7%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.7%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.7% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $47.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.