Universal Stylus Initiative
Legal name: Universal Stylus Initiative Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473000614
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Wakefield, MA, USA
- Phone
- +1 781-876-8814
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $201,667
- Expenses
- $486,418
- Assets
- $604,040
- Liabilities
- $149,453
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALEXANDER ERDMAN (PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN)
- HADI ZADEH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- PETER MUELLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- PETER MUELLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $121,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Universal Stylus Initiative (USI) exists to ensure that digital ink is just as universal. USI is an industry consortium that develops and maintains the open active stylus standard adopted across the computing ecosystem.
What it reported doing in 2025
Membership: usi is a member driven non-profit organization. Leading oems, stylus and touch controller manufacturers participate to drive industry standards to promote interoperable active styluses with touch-enabled devices such as phones, tablets, and computing and entertainment platforms. The number of members ranges from 35-45.usi 1.0 stylus and device specification: released in september 2016, the usi 1.0 specification provides independent hardware vendors (ihvs) and original equipment manufacturers (oems) for the first time an industry standard, non-proprietary, active stylus protocol. This solution will enable the oem, ihv and software ecosystem to develop a new generation of active styluses that provide consumers a consistent, customizable and interoperable experience across make, model and form-factor. The usi 1.0 specification also enables new usages for active styluses, such as multiple styluses operating simultaneously on a single device. The usi specification can be implemented on a wide range of touch-enabled devices, including phones, tablets, computing and entertainment platforms.the usi 1.0 specification defines a standard signaling mechanism and communication protocol between a stylus and a touch-enabled device. The 1.0 specification features a robust two-way protocol designed from the ground up to support a rich set of base features including multiple, simultaneous styluses as well as extensibility for per-vendor customization and future usages.users will be able to use a single usi stylus across all of their usi-enabled devices and any usi stylus shipped with devices will work with other usi-enabled devices, even those from different manufacturers. Additionally, the usi 1.0 specification also provides the capability to use multiple styluses from different manufacturers on a single device. This is a breakthrough capability and industry-first enabled by the usi 1.0 specification.an additional benefit of the usi standard is the ability to deliver a consistent stylus user experience across platforms. This consistency and ease-of-use, coupled with interoperability, increases the consumer appeal of an active stylus and will help proliferate the technology.usi has issued an errata in conjunction with the specification to amend, edit and define the specification details. Usi certification: the usi certification program allows members to measure compliance and ensure interoperability with the usi stylus and device specification. Companies completing certification may display the usi certified logo to demonstrate to consumers, customers and partners that they have created a high quality, interoperable usi implementation that is known to work with other usi implementations.the usi stylus certification program has been developed with the organization's core value proposition and brand promise in mind.usi brand promisea product bearing the usi certification mark will provide an experience that's personal, predictable and interoperable.personal - "my usi stylus customizable in a variety of ways."this is achieved through the availability of products in multiple form-factors or industrial designs and/or the ability to customize and configure parameters such as ink color, stroke, etc. On a per-stylus basis.predictable - "i know i can except the same experience from my usi stylus every time and everywhere i use it."this is achieved through consistent performance requirements across all usi certified products.interoperable - "i know my usi stylus is going to work on all of my devices."this is achieved through consistent electrical profile requirements across all usi certified products.to ensure that products uphold this brand promise and the overall integrity of the usi brand, the certification program enables measurement of adherence to the technical specification in real products and provides reasonable measures of acceptability.products that pass this level of acceptability are added to the certification register and have t
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -141.2%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $122K · 6 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $106K reported
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.