Unity Learning Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
593825629
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Covington, GA, USA
Phone
6784657013
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$169,000
Expenses
$158,899
Assets
$15,101
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Dr Tiffany Richardson (Board Member)
  • Kenneth Bryant (Board Chair)
  • Gloria Crook (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization is organized and operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes under Section 501c3 of the Internal Revenue Code Its primary exempt purpose is to advance education workforce development and community empowerment through STEAM education manufacturing training entrepreneurship programs career readiness initiatives technology integration mentorship and hands-on learning opportunities for youth adults and underserved communities The organization also provides educational programs related to innovation skilled trades sustainable manufacturing and economic development to prepare participants for high-demand careers and self-sufficiency

What it reported doing in 2025

Unity Learning Network Georgia nonprofit educational organization provided STEAM education entrepreneurship training leadership development academic support services workforce readiness programs and community enrichment activities for youth and underserved families throughout Georgia Programs included STEAM enrichment activities Leadership development workshops Entrepreneurship education Academic support programs Community outreach initiatives Workforce readiness training

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.