Unity Foundation of Tuscaloosa County I
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993869821
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Northport, AL, USA
- Phone
- 2052108895
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $60,500
- Expenses
- $10,705
- Assets
- $49,795
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRAD NEWMAN (PRESIDENT)
- JOE EATMON SR (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANDERSON WALKER (DIRECTOR)
- CARL JAMISON (DIRECTOR)
- RICK CLEMENTZ (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To change the culture for solving community problems by leveraging existing capacity to exponential impact for those who need it most. To create sustainable, life-changing solutions for social and environmental challenges.
What it reported doing in 2024
Process expert presentations, consultations and reviews with community leaders and organizations: united way of west Alabama, west Alabama food bank, ua honors college, kennemer institute for innovation and community serivce, healthy food innovation challenge finalist, state senators and representations, hays webb- district attorney, deh ceo, food scarcity focused project at clara verner focused incresing access to and consumption of fruits and vegetables for those in need, utilizing current programs and capacitites, and designed a new lean value stream mapping module for applicaiton in the non profit arena.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 35
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 12.8%; rating input score 13
- Program expense ratio: 72.5%; rating input score 72
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 82.3%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.65; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 12.8% of revenue deployed · 72.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.