CHI St. Gabriel's Health
Legal name: Unity Family Healthcare
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 410721642
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 320-631-5630
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88,171,073
- Expenses
- $95,676,170
- Assets
- $143,781,482
- Liabilities
- $114,017,087
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID JONES (BOARD MEMBER/MARKET PRESIDENT REGIONAL HOSPITAL)
- STEVEN SMITH (BOARD MEMBER/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- PAUL JOHNSON MD (PHYSICIAN): $1,101,432 total reported compensation
- DAVID EDGERTON JR MD (PHYSICIAN): $1,007,856 total reported compensation
- DAVID JONES (BOARD MEMBER/MARKET PRESIDENT REGIONAL HOSPITAL): $616,729 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Rooted in the healing ministry of Jesus, we provide compassionate, high-quality health care to all, with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule h
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 63
- Accountability: 73
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.1%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 87.3%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 70.6%; rating input score 71; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 70%; rating input score 70; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.5%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.79; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 96.1% of revenue deployed · 87.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $83.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $8M reported
- Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 329 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.