Unity Above Self in America Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
834110840
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Kingfisher, OK, USA
Phone
4053752351
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Finance, Taxation, Monetary Policy

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,400
Expenses
$8,081
Assets
$4,708

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ROBERT BRIAN WALTER (Director)
  • JAMES BRIAN HENDERSON (Director)
  • JOHN KRAMER GOODEN (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

This organization is organized exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes with the meaning of secton 501(c)3 of the internal Revenue code. It will engage in lawful acts and activities for which corporations may be organized under the general corporation law of Oklahoma. The purpose of Unity Above Self in America, Inc. is to reduce the burden of government, through: 1. Educating the public and elected officials about the importance of property managing our national debt and the budgetary process. 2. Persuasion of decision makers and the public through adverting with printed materials, online resources, and broadcast media. 3. Funding those efforts through the charitable donations of supporters of all types, within the fedral and state statues governing such activity. 4. Profiding access to the leadership of the corporation to decisiion makers who might change public policy regarding the national debt. 5. Training its corporate leadership in how best to improve publ

What it reported doing in 2025

Educating the public and elected officials about the importance of property managing our national debt and the budgetary process.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.5%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 78.3%; rating input score 78

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -27.6% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -37.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -17% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.5% of revenue deployed · 78.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.