United Womens Club of Lakeland Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
590757331
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Lakeland, FL, USA
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$50,494
Expenses
$44,049
Assets
$50,767

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Marcia Bright (President)

People named in this filing

  • Marcia Bright (President)
  • Joy Wright (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The United Womens Club of Lakeland is organized to promote community service civic engagement and charitable support within the Lakeland area. The organization provides volunteer opportunities supports local nonprofits and community initiatives and fosters educational cultural and social programs that strengthen the community. Our purpose is to bring women together in service leadership and fellowship to improve the quality of life for others.

What it reported doing in 2024

The United Womens Club of Lakeland provides charitable educational and community service programs that benefit residents of the Lakeland area. Our programs support local nonprofits schools and community initiatives through volunteer service fundraising and direct charitable contributions. We serve the general public including children families seniors and individuals in need. Key activities include organizing service projects collecting and donating school supplies supporting literacy and library programs assisting local charities such as VISTE and Hope House and contributing to statewide GFWC Florida initiatives. During the year the organization donated $2,300 to community charities and provided $400 in school supplies to a local elementary school directly supporting educational and social service needs in the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 85% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 5
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 5.3%; rating input score 5
  • Program expense ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 6

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.8%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.15; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 23.4% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.6% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 5.3% of revenue deployed · 6.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.