United Winegrowers For Sonoma County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680119964
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Phone
7074330963
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Government and Public Administration

Reported finances

Revenue
$112,961
Expenses
$159,667
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Louis Foppiano (President)

People named in this filing

  • Louis Foppiano (President)
  • Tom Gore (Director)
  • Doug McIlroy (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

United Winegrowers for Sonoma County represents winery and vineyard owners regarding land use, water issues, and related agricultural conc of the wine industry.

What it reported doing in 2018

United Winegrowers for Sonoma County played an active role in the following during the year ended December 31, 2018:1) Reviewed and commented on public projects affecting land use concerns of the organization including a regional recycled water irrigation project, open space acquisitions and winery permits.2) Tracked workshops and hearings related to development of an updated draft General Plan affecting land use developments, agricultural resources and habitat protections.3) Attended a series of workshops, public hearings and decision-making sessions on water issues facing the wine industry in Sonoma County.4) Contacted a wide array of community leaders and agency personnel representing the needs and interests of winery and vineyard owners regarding current operations and future direction.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -41.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -39.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.