United Way of Venango County and Titusville Region
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251219187
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Reno, PA, USA
- Phone
- 8146766545
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,272,261
- Expenses
- $1,037,764
- Assets
- $2,236,418
- Liabilities
- $115,877
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM PRICE (PRESIDENT)
- BOBBIE JONES (PRESIDENT)
- AMANDA HETRICK (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM PRICE (PRESIDENT): $89,798 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
United way of venango county and titusville region work to unify resources to create opportunities for our community to thrive.
What it reported doing in 2024
The united way of venango county and titusville region launched their career counselor program in 2019. This program helps facilitate the transition of students from school to the community by implementing the person-centered planning process in support of students' job and adult placement. Under the supervision of the building principals and in cooperation with the school counselors, the career counselor coordinates career readiness and awareness activities within a team comprised of the student, parent/guardian, educators, and service providers to ensure that career exploration activities and services are addressed and implemented for each student in grades 7-12.in 2022, united way was approached by two school districts expressing the need for additional school social workers. They had seen an increase in the need for services since the covid-19 pandemic began and felt this could make a major difference in the lives of their students. Through their collaboration, united way was able to provide education services specialists to multiple school districts. These positions are building relationships with school administrators, students, and families. Since the implementation of the program, the education services specialists have initiated group and individual counseling sessions, delivered social and emotional lessons, provided crisis intervention, and conducted overall guidance meetings. The specialists are required to be licensed social workers which also permits them to follow up with parents and handle situations that surpass the scope of in-school services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 75% for direct work, and 25% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.9%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 88.3%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.01 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 77.1%; rating input score 77; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.4%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.16; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.7%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.9% of revenue deployed · 88.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $916K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $90K · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 46/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.