United Way of Transylvania County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237145022
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019
- Location
- Brevard, NC, USA
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $213,465
- Expenses
- $437,140
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
People named in this filing
- RICHARD LINDGREN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To build a stronger transylvania county by mobilizing our community to empower people to improve their lives.
What it reported doing in 2019
1. Funded 10 programs from 7 agencies in our regular allocation pool. This pool represents those agencies that have been serving individuals and families in our county for 3 or more years (over 50 years in some cases), have proven track records of service and accountability to the community and who combined had over 10,000 client outcomes.2. Jointly, with county government, funded the 2-1-1 help line for the county. This service has helped over 1200 individuals and families, this past year, find the help they needed when they needed it, provided a source for volunteers to find a place to help, and is now providing data on unmet needs for our county and the region.3. Funded get connected, a virtual volunteer network allowing all community agencies to post volunteer needs and people wating to volunteer to find matches for their interest. The site had over 35,000 hits. 4. Funded 6 collaborative programs where two or more agencies work together to create sustainable improvements in the lives of a defined population. We are funding (and advising) six collaboratives in the areas of education, financial stability and health. The train (transylvania resource access and information network) to link our intake agencies, enabling true case management to occur, has been operating two years now. Not only does it now have all or almost all our low to moderate income families in it but also is demonstrating the success of case management with a number of families being guided to true self-sufficiency. The connect collaborative, an active partnership of the childrens center, the family place, dss and now the school system and health department has demonstrated a $116,000 saving/year by empowering families to elimate rish factors to avoid having children go into foster care. Families and money is a collaborative between ontrack & western carolina community action to teach financial education skills to both children from 1st-9th grade and their parents. Funded a collaborative between safe and pisgah legal to get victims of domestic violence the local legal care they need. Finally, we funded the bridging the gap collaborative between neighbors in ministry and el centro to mentor families at higher risk of not adequately supporting their children.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 64% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 97.6%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -104.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -15% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 1 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $427K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 23 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.