United Way of the Bay Area
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941312348
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4158084300
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,895,020
- Expenses
- $21,442,537
- Assets
- $24,186,546
- Liabilities
- $4,825,401
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ESCOBAR LAURA (VICE PRESIDENT, SAFETY NET SERVICES)
- HARDEN NICOLE (VICE PRESIDENT, ECONOMIC SUCCESS)
- CHAN JACQUELINE - VICE (PRESIDENT, EVALUATION AND LEARNING)
- CHEUNG WINNIE (VICE PRESIDENT, TRANSFORMATION)
Highest reported compensation
- BERINI CHRISTOPHER (CHIEF ADVANCEMENT OFFICER): $322,511 total reported compensation
- BATSON KELLY - INTERIM CEO ((THRU 10/24), CCIO (AS OF 10/24)): $320,388 total reported compensation
- KATAOKA BRIAN (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $266,085 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Uwba mobilizes the bay area to dismantle the root causes of poverty and build equitable pathways to prosperity. Through initiatives and policy change, we provide immediate and long term support for employment, housing, financial stability, and meeting basic needs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Emergency food & shelter program (efsp): efsp is critical to uwba's poverty-fighting agenda. This year, efsp entered its 41st year of funding safety net programs. This federal funding is allocated to the federal emergency management agency (fema), which works with united way worldwide as the fiscal agent for the program. Efsp is a unique public-private partnership between the federal government and the united way system. Since its inception, uwba and local boards (local boards are mandated local committees that have oversight of the federal funding) have allocated federal funding to hundreds of food and shelter programs. For this most recent round of funding, efsp allocated $2,705,115 to agencies in eight counties. A total of 267,686 unduplicated individuals were served by one of the 116 efsp-funded agencies in the bay area during the current grant period. While this is not funding raised by uwba, it is vital that uwba's expertise and relationships are leveraged to support our local food and shelter programs.emergency assistance network (ean): ean is a collaboration with seven local santa clara county partner agencies that offers assistance to families and individuals experiencing emergency situations. This collaborative provides food assistance, rent and mortgage aid, utility assistance, medical and transportation aid, often alongside case management and financial education. Uwba is acting as the backbone convener of the ean to provide convening and staff support to the network. This year the ean served 90,091 individuals at food pantries and distributed over $15 million in direct assistance as a network. Ean agencies assisted 37,898 households in the community, specifically with housing and utility assistance.labor community services: the labor community services program is a comprehensive resource for working families. Uwba provides grant funding to three central labor councils that provide information and referral, direct hardship assistance, high-impact workforce programs, community organizing, immigration legal services, and civic engagement opportunities. The three labor community services councils served 37,507 households (61,082 individuals) with direct financial assistance for hardships or provided navigation services and connection to other local social services agencies.youth opportunity pathways: youth opportunity pathways, a uwba program provides career exploration and readiness opportunities for young people aged 14-28. This year, uwba continued to partner across the region. Through partnerships, we provide youth with mentorship, job readiness activities, and college access support. We engaged with 6 community partners, serving 4,116 youth. These youth received mentorship services, and 1,476 enrolled in further skills training or participated in career exploration events. 246 youth participated in internships or other work-based learning activities. We hosted our annual college essay review event which supported 16 youth in their college application journey. Additionally, our signature event, on track, was hosted at the oakland museum and had 20 corporate partners volunteer to table and mentor young people.housing justice: uwba continued our housing justice work through projects in gilroy and solano county. There was $347,200 in uwba grantmaking served 8,471 individuals in over 5,417 households. We continued our community ambassador grantmaking efforts, training and supporting uwba ambassadors to review applications and awards. The ambassadors led a process to grant $216,000 to 20 grantees. Uwba continued a region-wide public will-building campaign, "learn, understand, act," to engage and encourage people to advocate for local and regional policy changes that will increase affordable housing in the bay area.public policy: uwba recognizes that to achieve uwba's goal of ending poverty in the community, we must advance public policies that support uwba's mission. Uwba's public policy team influences policy and enga
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 57% for direct work, 43% for grants, and 0% for affiliated organizations.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 72.7%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 79.4%; rating input score 79; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -54.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 72.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $15.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $323K · 20 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 139 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 128 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.