United Way of Sullivan County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020339806
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Newport, NH, USA
Phone
6035430121
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,112
Expenses
$104,679
Assets
$102,099
Liabilities
$11,977

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHERRIE CURTIS (PRESIDENT)
  • BETH MCALLISTER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DAWN RANNEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • SHERRIE CURTIS (PRESIDENT)
  • TAUSHA SHUTE (SECRETARY)
  • BETH MCALLISTER (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of sullivan county communities. The united way makes measurable long term positive changes in people's lives. United way of sullivan county is involved in numerous local initiatives including but not limited to oral health mobility options and youth programs.

What it reported doing in 2020

The united way of sullivan county is a non profit corporation which was formed to raise and distribute funds for the community's needs. The united way's fundraising efforts are concentrated in the sullivan county area of the state of New Hampshire. Annual campaigns are conducted in the fall of each year to support programs primarily in the subsequent year. Campaign contributions are used to support local health and human services programs of member agencies and to pay the operating expenses of the local chapter. Net campaign results are allocated to member agencies.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 22
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 35.4%; rating input score 35
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.5%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 49.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 35.4% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.