United Way of Southern Nevada
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880071328
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7027342273
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,856,644
- Expenses
- $21,515,056
- Assets
- $11,053,077
- Liabilities
- $5,060,127
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SAMUEL RUDD (PRESIDENT &)
- JULIAN HIGH (PRES & CEO ()
Highest reported compensation
- SAMUEL RUDD (PRESIDENT &): $224,562 total reported compensation
- AARON KROLIKOWSKI (VP PROGRAMS): $173,190 total reported compensation
- KAREN ALONSO (CHIEF ADVAN): $169,284 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
United way of southern Nevada, inc. (the organization or united way) is a not-for-profit corporation governed by a local volunteer board of directors. The organization was incorporated in 1957 and its operations are primarily in clark county. The organization is one of more than 1,200 local, independent united ways across the country. United way's mission is to unite our community to improve people's lives. The organization is innovative and collaborative in their efforts to create a better community for all. United way is working with and through strategic partners to address the issues that no one agency can solve alone. The organization brings innovative thinking to the conversation, creating momentum through funds, volunteers, and support to scale the work of partners in the community. With these partners, united way is supporting children and families through its community based agenda. United way engages the community in selecting partners with innovative approaches, provides the
What it reported doing in 2024
United way of southern Nevada administers public and private funding for early education and provided related programs and services, including support for preschool scholarships through the Nevada ready state pre- kindergarten program and neighborhood network. The goal of uwsns early education programs is to expand access to, and enrollment in, high-quality early education programs in center-based and home-based settings across the state of Nevada. United way of southern Nevada is expanding access to high-quality school readiness programs in partnership with the Nevada department of education through the nv ready state pre-k program. In 2024-2025, uwsn supported 1,437 children and families with free preschool seats at private and independent early education centers across the state of Nevada. Outcomes include increased equitable access for children from low-income households to attend high-quality prek programs, financial relief for parents, technical assistance for preschools to expand family participation in their childs academic journey, and tracking student learning outcomes. Neighborhood network is a peer-focused professional development opportunity for home-based childcare providers that includes peer networking and support, cpr and first aid training, sponsored field trips, professional development, and parent engagement workshops. In 2024-2025, neighborhood network ensured over 50 home-based childcare providers had access to key supportive resources, learning opportunities, and professional networking.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 79% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.8%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 85.9%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.6%; rating input score 99; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.2%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.8% of revenue deployed · 85.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $18.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $225K · 31 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 38 of 40 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 61 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 53 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.