United Way of South Hampton Roads
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 540506322
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Norfolk, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7578538500
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,537,513
- Expenses
- $19,927,011
- Assets
- $65,983,478
- Liabilities
- $4,560,328
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
41 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ronald M Uren (Chief Executive Officer)
Highest reported compensation
- Ronald M Uren (Chief Executive Officer): $300,073 total reported compensation
- Kristel Fitzgerald (Chief Operating Officer): $231,333 total reported compensation
- Viven McMahan (VP, Community Impact): $163,324 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
UWSHR's mission is to bring people and resources together to solve problems too big for anyone to solve alone.
What it reported doing in 2024
UWSHR conducts fundraising campaigns, acts as an administrative agent, and distributes funds to participating area organizations according to donor designations and fund distribution committee recommendations. Program Services - Community Investments: UWSHR envisions a community where all individuals and families thrive and reach their full potential. To fully realize this vision, we must support those living in or on the verge of poverty or crisis with navigating a path to self-sufficiency. Factors that prevent children and families from experiencing safe, stable and successful lives are complex and must be addressed holistically. UWSHR is focused on partnering with vulnerable populations in the South Hampton Roads communities. This includes those below the Federal Poverty Level as well as those struggling to make ends meet, who we call ALICE .ALICE is an acronym coined by a collaborating group of United Ways that stands for Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed. The ALICE population represents a growing number of households in our community who work hard and earn more than the official Federal Poverty Level, but less than the basic cost of living. ALICE makes too much to qualify for most government assistance yet struggles to afford life's essentials. Typically, ALICE is one life changing event from falling into poverty. To best serve these populations and provide cutting-edge, big-picture solutions, we work with a network of partners and a set of tools that help us deliver results effectively and efficiently: Mobility Mentoring is a model developed by Economic Mobility Pathways that we adopted in 2016. We believe that the methods, principles and research of Mobility Mentoring can be applied at varying degrees in diverse settings across health and human services. GHRconnects, the Community Indicators Dashboard, tracks meaningful, accurate and standardized data over time. It gives a clear picture of how our region is performing in a variety of critical areas and drives data-driven decisions to help us turn the curve and improve quality of life. GHRconnects also documents and promotes best practices and serves as a space for community collaboratives to communicate the impact of their work. Unite Us is a collaborative software that allows us to seamlessly connect people with the services they need in real time. It shifts our work from fragmented services to coordinated care networks. Results-Based Accountability (RBA) is an approach that encompasses population and performance accountability. RBA provides a simple, structured approach for measuring performance of programs and services. RBA has three types of performance measures: how much did you do? how well did you do it? and is anyone better off? Measures that indicate whether anyone is better off are most important and meaningful yet are hardest to control. Program Services - Program Initiatives: United Way of South Hampton Roads has two current initiatives: Mission United and United for Children, which are long-term, multi-sector efforts that focus on specific populations and address entrenched problems by establishing a common agenda and aligning resources and strategy. Mission United is the first-ever coordinated network of community resources and services in Hampton Roads providing relief and support to veterans, active duty military members, and their families. Utilizing Unite Us technology, we seamlessly connect military-connected individuals and families to services such as affordable housing, job training and healthcare. United for Children exists to give every child in South Hampton Roads the support needed to achieve their dreams. Through cross-sector partnerships with nonprofits, faith-based partners, city governments, school districts and community stakeholders, we have built promising solutions by carrying the voice of our community on the issues that matter most for children. Program Services - Other Program: The United Way of South Hampton Roads also pro
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 60% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 67% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.6 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.4%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.7%; rating input score 97; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.31; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 29 of 30 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $300K · 41 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $362K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 66 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 61 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.