United Way of San Diego County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
952213995
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Diego, CA, USA
Phone
8584922000
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Federated Giving Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,525,576
Expenses
$6,320,585
Assets
$16,139,176
Liabilities
$2,287,053

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NANCY SASAKI (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • NANCY SASAKI (PRESIDENT & CEO): $289,763 total reported compensation
  • SHANNON GONZALEZ (COO): $225,685 total reported compensation
  • JAMES MCCONCHIE (VP, COLLECTIVE IMPACT): $153,708 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.

What it reported doing in 2024

United way of san diego county ensures children, individuals, and families have the support they need to achieve educational success and financial security.education: united way of san diego county is deeply committed to education, and the urgency of our work has never been more apparent as the educational achievement gaps within our community continue to widen. By listening to the people in our region's distinct, vibrant communities, we urgently address deeply rooted disparities in historically under-resourced communities where children are not reaching their full potential. We collaborate with these communities and leverage the strength of our partners countywide - businesses, government, schools, policymakers, and nonprofit organizations - to collectively achieve lasting change for children, young adults, and families. To bridge these gaps across the region, which typically fall along racial and socio-economic lines, we strategically focus on key areas such as early childhood literacy, so children can reach milestones like reading proficiently by the end of third grade, and career readiness, so students are exposed to high-paying, in-demand steam careers across different industries. We engage 12k donors, 341 community and corporate partners, 22 schools, and 942 volunteers to serve over 45k families and children throughout san diego county. We know we are achieving our goals by tracking family engagement, developing literacy-rich environments for children, and measuring the number of students who see steam careers as a possibility through after-school programs and summer work-based learning opportunities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 58
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.9%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 56.2%; rating input score 56
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.55; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.1%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -13.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.9% of revenue deployed · 56.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $290K · 19 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 43 of 43 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.