United Way of Northern New Mexico Serving Los Alamos & Rio Arriba Co
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237138947
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Los Alamos, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5056620800
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $714,986
- Expenses
- $876,388
- Assets
- $656,691
- Liabilities
- $26,833
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- CINDY PADILLA (EX DIRECTOR): $61,852 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
United way of northern New Mexico is a service organization that works with integrity and ethics to foster collaboration, ensure inclusivity, respect and generousity honoring family, tradition and culture.
What it reported doing in 2024
The united way of northern New Mexico works to improve the lives of children and families through service collaboration. United way northern New Mexico rallies individuals and organizations. Together, we turn obstacles into opportunities creating a future where collective action transforms communities. In rio arriba county there is a long-term lack of needed resources and opportunities for the most fragile age groups (young children, the disabled and elderly); and behavioral risks, including substance use disorder and opioid use disorder. Rio arriba county's rural, primarily hispanic and native american region has (1) extremely high levels of opioid abuse and deaths; (2) other health risks; (3) poverty and limited employment; (4) educational, skill, and workforce issues; and (5) economic challenges according to the 2020 rio arriba community health council health profile. According to the los alamos community services department's 2020 health services gap analysis, los alamos residents currently identify access to issues to mental health supports as a top community public health access to care issue. Availability of mental health resources related to stress and anxiety are especially needed for teens and adults. Los alamos county health challenges, trends, and issues that should be understood and addressed include: (1) family stresses, behavioral health issues ( including substance abuse), and teen depression and suicide; (2) high rate of unintentional injury from falls, usually among older adults, (3) very high rate of deaths from alzheimer's disease, (4) lack of access to affordable childcare, and (5) lack of affordable housing. Because of health indicators like these the united way of northern New Mexico supported twenty four nonprofit organizations across rio arriba and los alamos counties in 2024 that primarily serve education, basic needs, and health and wellness of residents in the region.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 68% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 83%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $22.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96%; rating input score 96; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -22.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $727K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $62K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 22 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 21 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.