United Way of North Central New Mexico

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850277138
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Phone
5052473671
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Federated Giving Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,588,871
Expenses
$16,731,747
Assets
$24,225,316
Liabilities
$5,719,756

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

37 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RODNEY PRUNTY (PRES. & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • RODNEY PRUNTY (PRES. & CEO): $330,740 total reported compensation
  • PAMELA GALLEGOS-MUSSER (COO): $138,809 total reported compensation
  • VALERIE INGRAM (CIO): $130,570 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Uwncnm's mission is to connect people to opportunities and services to equitably improve lives and strengthen communities. That is done through direct service programs, community investment (grant making), community outreach (convening and collaborating) and leading the community in its efforts to improve college/career readiness for students to succeed in finding a meaningful path to higher education and/or the workforce.

What it reported doing in 2024

United way administers the following programs: rising together the community impact team works on projects that deliver collective impact to its service area. We call this body of work rising together and it focuses on the following topics: k-12 learning, college/career readiness, adults in education and family resilience. K-12 learning: attendance and engagement uwncnm's attendance team support group (a collective impact team made up of community partners, school districts and the nm public education department) offers in-person conferences twice yearly and virtual workshops for school-based attendance teams statewide. The trainings offer tools and techniques teams can use to implement the attendance for success act and reduce chronic absenteeism. Nmped is taking on a larger role in implementing the conferences so that the attendance support group can focus on content going forward. Uwncnm also partners with nmped in presenting virtual workshops to address the needs of attendance teams in-between conferences. Uwncnm's attendance team support group continues to partner with aps to offer two annual aps specific conferences that support aps attendance teams as they create and implement their statewide attendance improvement plans. A major attendance topic in 2024 for all conferences was the importance of developing relationships with students and families as an important factor in reducing barriers to attendance. In total, 56 districts and over 150 schools participated. 93% of survey respondents said that after the conference, they felt positive about the direction of their attendance work and 97% of survey respondents agreed that, after the conference, they felt their school is more prepared to start their attendance strategies next school year more quickly. College/career readiness: valencia county partnership for a work ready community since 2017, uwncnm's valencia county partnership for a work ready community has been building a shared understanding of employers' needs so students can be better prepared for all possible opportunities after high school. The partnership has worked with over 7,600 students, 153 teachers and 93 businesses. Projects include resume writing workshops, mock interviews, employer presentations, student videos of career explorations and hiring fairs at los lunas, valencia and century high schools. In the annual summer teacher academy, employers present to teachers on the skills they look for when hiring. Participants come from belen, los lunas, school of dreams and moriarty edgewood schools. Consistently, nearly 90% of students say they have a better understanding of the skills needed in the workplace and 99% of teachers report a better understanding of what employers are looking for. Adults in education almost 300,000 adults in central New Mexico do not have a college degree or certificate. Research shows that, in addition to earning more, people with a higher education credential are more economically resilient and better able to survive economic downturns. Children of parents with post-high school education are more likely to complete high school and attain a credential themselves. Uwncnm works with schools, community organizations, employers and government to address barriers and create a system of support for adults who want to complete an educational credential but need help to do it. Higher education access & success echo this virtual network invites counselors, educational navigators, advisors, case managers, nonprofit staff and workforce development trainers to gain knowledge and connections to better support youth and adults on their higher education journeys. Echo uses short presentations on case studies related to individual or systems issues, and peer-to-peer suggestions and sharing. An average of 34 participants representing eight higher education institutions, six city/state agencies, twenty nonprofits, eight secondary schools and three businesses attended monthly sessions. Education-fri

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 66
  • Accountability: 98
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.8%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 81.7%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 46.3%; rating input score 46; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 96.9%; rating input score 97; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.8% of revenue deployed · 81.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 31 of 32 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $331K · 37 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.