United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042382233
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Boston, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6176248000
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,381,335
- Expenses
- $46,365,031
- Assets
- $60,924,198
- Liabilities
- $10,925,795
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
54 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Marty Martinez (President and CEO)
- Robert Giannino (President and CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Daphne Principe-Griffin (Chief of Staff): $291,963 total reported compensation
- Alison Ginsberg (Chief Financial Officer/Assistant Treasurer): $263,874 total reported compensation
- Karley Ausiello (Chief, Community Impact): $237,078 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance an economically just region where prosperity is shared across race and ethnicity.
What it reported doing in 2024
EARLY EDUCATION AND OUT-OF-SCHOOL TIME LEADING CROSS SECTOR COLLABORATION - Closing Achievement Gaps THE CHALLENGE - Students in Massachusetts face barriers that extend beyond the classroom. Chronic absenteeism is again on the rise, with 29% of low-income students missing more than 10 percent of school in 2025. In some districts like Boston, Lawrence, Lynn, and Lowell, the rates of absenteeism are as high as 20-30%. OUR APPROACH - Systems Leadership Through Community Schools United Way brings together people and partners across sectors to close achievement gaps and strengthen support for the whole child. We convene educators, families, nonprofit partners, and policymakers to align resources, integrate services, and create school-centered ecosystems of support. OUR RESPONSE & RESULTS United Way is expanding the Community Schools strategy across Massachusetts, turning schools into hubs that link families, schools, and local resources to support the whole child: - In the 24 community schools funded across Boston, Lynn, and Haverhill, chronic absenteeism decreased by an average of 3.95%. - Six community schools successfully exited DESE turnaround status, including Lowell's Bartlett, Butler, Moody, and Greenhalge schools, and Lynn's Ford and Washington schools. - Community partnerships raised $300,000 in monetary and in-kind donations for two United Way-supported schools in Haverhill. - The Massachusetts Coalition for Community Schools, led by United Way, is advocating to scale the model statewide. INVESTING IN AGENCIES - Making Childcare & After-School Programs Affordable and Accessible THE CHALLENGE - Massachusetts has some of the highest childcare costs in the country. High-quality early education remains inaccessible to families with the greatest need: Only 43% of low-income children are enrolled in preschool, and just 25% of Boston's school-age children participate in summer learning programs. OUR APPROACH - Strategic Investment to Scale What Works Investing in community-based organizations is one of United Way's core levers for advancing systemic impact. We deploy funding strategically to strengthen high-performing providers, expand proven models, and build regional capacity. United Way also drives statewide solutions to make early education and after-school programs accessible and affordable. OUR RESPONSE & RESULTS - Advanced a sustainable business model for family childcare entrepreneurs through Shared Services MA, training and licensing 62 educators, creating 372 new childcare slots, and expanding culturally responsive care in the Merrimack Valley. - Deployed state funding and resources to expand summer learning and after-school programs through the Summer Step Up program, reaching 1,863 children in partnership with 53 organizations across 28 communities. - Mobilized capital and expertise to strengthen 66 early education community-based partners across the region, providing thousands of young children with high-quality learning environments to address gaps in access and affordability.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 86% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 95
- Accountability: 99
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 87.2%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 86.5%; rating input score 86; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 97.6%; rating input score 98; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.31; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 41 of 42 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $40.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $292K · 54 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 363 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 351 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.